When talking about the law who is up for the truth?
They are legitimate concerns and reasons, no doubt why people are divided more now than ever, but there is another division due to C-19 whether manufactured or not. Although society may not like this article or perhaps even not care here is the truth. If society acknowledges the fact that this same so-called government that claims to care while having no duty or obligation to secure or keep the public safe society would better understand that what the so-called government is feeding them is bullshit. Jared Polis’s, Cheeto head’s and the rest of the public servants “stay at home order” derives from “no actual law” it derives from the “rule of man” null and void. It also derives from weak faith, fear, false safety and security. I’m not saying not to take personal responsibility and prevention that is each individual’s own position, but in no way can another individual force their will, faith, false safety or security on others. Those who do need to ask themselves who is violating who. At times it may seem that some are being intentionally irresponsible with their actions and although irresponsibility is a factor of ordinary human life, not all or not even most are intentional it seems some can forget that easily. Why did Jared Polis back track?
What their laws do say:
Article 2 Bill of Rights Section 4:
The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination, shall forever hereafter be guaranteed; and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege or capacity, on account of his opinions concerning religion; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be construed to dispense with oaths or affirmations, excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the good order, peace or safety of the state. No person shall be required to attend or support any ministry or place of worship, religious sect or denomination against his consent. Nor shall any preference be given by law to any religious denomination or mode of worship.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I don’t profess to know everything like the opposition or others all I do know is that these actions will definitely have a long lasting reaction and seems continuous plot to normalize it among other things the opposition has done already unlawfully.
When public servants and Bar attorneys don’t have a fucking clue!!!
(Extreme Distance Order)
The ‘establishment of religion’ clause of the First Amendment means at least this:
No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbelief’s, for church attendance or non-attendance.
When society is willing to allow the suspension of their own freedom for false security, they will neither have freedom, safety nor security.